Skip to main content

Insatiable in Appetite

Bohemian Rhapsody refers to the song of the same name but doesn't get a full play throughout the film.That's the negative stuff out of the way. It's a biopic of the late, great, Queen front man Freddie Mercury. With so many surviving witnesses to his life it seems fair to assume that a lot of the film is based in fact and there has been talk of parts of his history being glossed over for the sake of the movie. Fine by us! There really was no need for any greater detail than was shown, with the focus being his music and his relationships.

The sing-a-long version didn't detract from the film (Mum saw it a few months ago) but didn't appear to add much, as there aren't many times that a song is played all the way through, so there is little opportunity to throw yourself into it.


Rami Malek was born to play Freddie Mercury and it is impossible to review this film without talking about his impeccable performance. It is clear that he had spent many hours watching footage of Freddie Mercury in order to recreate so many of his foibles, particularly performances from recent history that many of us remember vividly.

Because of the songs and the way the band are portrayed, culminating in their incredible Live Aid performance, it is mostly a feel good film and sing-a-long or not you leave with a Queen song in your heart, but of course we all know how it ends which tinges the whole experience with sadness for a talent lost so young.




We will give each film we see a score out of 10 for overall enjoyment.
Bohemian Rhapsody = 9 It lost a point for not giving us the chance to sing Bohemian Rhapsody all the way through.

The card we have is £17.90 per month for a minimum of 12 months or a one off payment of £214.80. Get yours here→ www.cineworld.co.uk

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This is not a cartoon. This is the real world.

We had really low expectations of Glass , because we hadn't enjoyed Split, although we both thought Unbreakable was a masterpiece. The fear was, where would M. Night Shyamalan take it, but where he took it was to comic book land and it worked beautifully. There were unexpected twists and turns but the core characters stayed true to their comic book personae, and new characters were introduced who helped the plot to build into the ultimate stand off. Visually it was very interesting, and colour was used to add to the fibre and atmosphere of the film, from the stark white hospital rooms and the vast pink room where they meet, to the silver metropolis seen from the parking lot. The characters were played brilliantly and Samuel L. Jackson was enigmatic in the title role. It was difficult not to feel empathy for Bruce Willis, as his intent was pure from the start, albeit vigilante. James McAvoy plays the part that is most difficult to sympathise with, and although he continues to b...

I Love Five People and Ponce is Two of them

Julia Roberts proving that she really can act and Lucas Hedges proving that be is wise beyond his years, in a sad take on a Mother's need to protect her child against all sound reasoning and at a cost to the rest of her family and potentially her own well-being. Ben is Back  is a lovely film with sadness and risk running throughout it. Told again from a slightly different angle, but with lots of familiar themes and issues. The mistrust when someone has a history of drug use, the desperate need of a parent to protect and understand their child, especially when their behaviour is alien or out of character. The film mostly documents one night in these peoples lives and the dark turns and lengths they go to, and how decisions they make impact upon each other. We will give each film we see a score out of 10 for overall enjoyment. Ben is Back  =  8         No feel good elements which made it hard to enjoy although a very good film. The card...

Sh Shit!

Shazam! is an absolutely dreadful pile of tosh. The story was poorly thought out and executed and the characters were inconsistent. The effects were everything you expect in this sort of film. The humour was not. We have come to the conclusion at last that these super hero films just aren't for us. In fact we already knew that but the trailer for this one was so misleading that we actually thought it would be amusing. It wasn't, and we didn't give it the satisfaction of even watching it til the end. Rubbish. The trailer made the film look like a deadpool-esque parody of a comic book character. It hinted at humour but this wasn't forthcoming. We felt duped by the trailer which certainly wasn't a true representation of the film. The only redeeming features were the foster parents and we agreed that we would have preferred to see the development of that storyline. We will give each film we see a score out of 10 for overall enjoyment. Shazam!  =  2   ...